ZimbabweHuchi Uncategorized Zimbabwe’s 1% Wealth Tax U-Turn: Mthuli Ncube Revises Rules Amidst Public Furore

Zimbabwe’s 1% Wealth Tax U-Turn: Mthuli Ncube Revises Rules Amidst Public Furore

Zimbabwe’s 1% Wealth Tax U-Turn: Mthuli Ncube Revises Rules Amidst Public Furore post thumbnail image
Zimbabwe’s Finance Minister, Mthuli Ncube, responded to public outcry and parliamentary debate, introducing amendments to the controversial 1% wealth tax proposal. Here’s what’s been altered:

Property Tax Adjustments Demystified:

What’s Changed?

Previously, the government proposed a 1% tax on properties valued at US$100,000 or more. However, following major concerns and criticisms from many parties, Minister Mthuli Ncube has made the following adjustments:

  • Exemption for Primary Residences: If your home is your main residence, no tax applies, even if the home is valued at more than US$100,000.
  • Tax Threshold Increase: Only additional properties valued over US$250,000 will face the 1% tax.

In simpler terms:

  • Your Main Home’s Safe: If your home is where you live most of the time, no tax for you!
  • Higher Property Value Threshold: The tax will only affect extra houses or properties worth more than US$250,000.

How The 1% Wealth Tax will be collected

To make sure this tax gets collected, the Zimbabwe Revenue Authority (ZIMRA) will team up with local councils. Plus, there’s a limit – no property will pay more than US$50,000 each year.

ALSO READ: Mthuli Ncube Slashes Proposed Passport Fee Hike in Budget Session

Mthuli Ncube-Image Source@iharare

So, in simpler terms, if you’ve got one home where you live, you’re off the hook. But if you’ve got more properties or very fancy houses, then some tax might come your way, collected through ZIMRA, and there’s a maximum limit to what you’ll pay.

Ncube’s Focus on Informal Businesses

Ncube aims to reel in unregistered micro-businesses, spotlighting backyard chicken producers and informal enterprises. His recent budget speech outlined stringent measures to bring the flourishing but unregulated informal sector under government taxation purview.

He proposed stringent conditions, stating, “Only licensed and Tax Compliant Operators will procure goods from manufacturers and wholesalers.”

The Controversy Unfolds: Public Outcry and Political Backlash

Tax Hikes and Criticisms:

The government faced backlash over various proposed increases, including:

  • Passport Fees: Proposed to hike from US$120 to US$200.
  • Toll Gate Fees: A significant upsurge was suggested.
  • Wealth Tax: Set at 1% for properties valued at US$100,000 or more.

Critics lambasted the government’s strategy, denouncing the budget as “anti-people” and burdening Zimbabwe’s already struggling populace. The opposition and economists alike expressed concerns over regressive taxes amplifying the woes of the impoverished.

Defence and Justification

Ncube’s Perspective:

Defending the budget, Ncube emphasized its intended benefits for citizens, asserting, “It is always pro-people… the resources are used in providing services or supporting citizens.”

He highlighted specific tax allocations, citing the wealth tax as a redistributive mechanism and a means to bolster infrastructural development in urban areas, particularly benefiting the urban population.

Mixed Reactions and Economic Implications

Public Outcry and Expert Opinions:

While Ncube’s amendments to the wealth tax aim to assuage public dissent, the broader budget continues to spark debates regarding its impact on Zimbabwe’s economy and populace.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Post